A Mental Model for Distributed Compute: Kubernetes, Slurm, Ray, and Spark
A developer is seeking a cleaner mental model for distributed compute systems, rather than learning each framework independently. They note that systems like Kubernetes, Slurm, Ray, and Spark, despite using different abstractions, share common underlying problems such as scheduling, resource management, worker execution, state, communication, memory, and failure recovery. An article on Substack further explores the architecture behind modern distributed systems.
- Published
- 09/07, 20:33 UTC+0
- Ingested
- 09/08, 00:00 UTC+0
- Source type
- Dev community
- Tier
- Community
- Source status
- Healthy
Tier is a per-source editorial setting, not a per-item score.
I’ve been trying to build a cleaner mental model for distributed compute systems instead of learning each framework independently.
Kubernetes, Slurm, Ray, and Spark all use different abstractions, but many of the underlying problems are the same: scheduling, resource management, worker execution, state, communication, memory, and failure recovery.
I wrote up the framework-independent model first, then mapped each system onto it.
Would be interested in how others think about the boundaries between cluster scheduler, runtime, and application-level scheduler.
Article: https://pawankjha.substack.com/p/the-architecture-behind-modern-distributed