New AA intelligence index v5 with “Private tests” conveniently upranks GPT, Google’s models, while open weights chinese models downrank
The new Artificial Analysis intelligence index v5 is facing criticism for its introduction of "private tests" on private datasets. This change has reportedly led to a significant downranking of current open-weights models, particularly Chinese models, while conveniently upranking models from GPT and Google. The community finds this shift suspicious, questioning the transparency and methodology behind the v5 index's scoring.
Time & source
Times shown in UTC
Display time zone: UTC
Local time zone unavailable; showing UTC.
PublishedOffset at this time: UTC+0Oct 29, 2026, 08:35 UTC
IngestedOffset at this time: UTC+0Oct 29, 2026, 14:01 UTC
- Published
- Oct 29, 2026, 08:35
- Ingested
- Oct 29, 2026, 14:01
- Source type
- Dev community
- Tier
- Community
- Source status
- Healthy
Tier is a per-source editorial setting, not a per-item score.
Discussion trend
The percentage is based on collected discussion signal, not new comments or independent people. The curve only compares the same topic across time.
The new Artificial Analysis intelligence index v5, is being criticised, because its introduction of "trust me bro" private tests on private datasets, significantly downranking current open weights models on the index.
I think its fairly suspicious, what do you?