I ran 100 Terminal-Bench 2.1 slots on Luna 5.6 and Luna 6. The Luna 6 results still look like a joke

A user conducted 100 Terminal-Bench 2.1 tests on Luna 5.6 and Luna 6, noting that Luna 6's performance was significantly worse. The tests, run across various configurations like Medium Standard, High Fast, and Max Fast, showed Luna 5.6 consistently achieving higher success rates (e.g., 82/100 to 93/100) compared to Luna 6 (e.g., 29/100 to 62/100). Despite Luna 6 having lower estimated costs and faster trial times, its overall success rate was notably inferior, leading the user to describe the results as a "joke."

This report uniquely provides a direct, user-conducted benchmark comparison of Luna 5.6 and Luna 6 performance across 100 Terminal-Bench 2.1 slots, unlike official or theoretical analyses.