AI researchers put out videos saying superintelligence is ‘exactly as dangerous as it sounds’
AI researchers, including Google DeepMind's Neel Nanda, are releasing videos to warn about the dangers of superintelligence, with Nanda stating there's "at least a 10 percent chance that it causes human extinction." These warnings highlight the ongoing debate within the "AI safety" community regarding the definition of AI safety and effective solutions, as the videos themselves do not offer a single cohesive solution.
Time & source
Times shown in UTC
Display time zone: UTC
Local time zone unavailable; showing UTC.
PublishedOffset at this time: UTC+0Sep 29, 2026, 17:35 UTC
IngestedOffset at this time: UTC+0Sep 29, 2026, 22:00 UTC
- Published
- Sep 29, 2026, 17:35
- Ingested
- Sep 29, 2026, 22:00
- Source type
- Media
- Tier
- Press
- Source status
- Healthy
Tier is a per-source editorial setting, not a per-item score.
Stevie Bonifield
is a news writer covering all things consumer tech. Stevie started out at Laptop Mag writing news and reviews on hardware, gaming, and AI.
“The chance of human extinction is about a coin flip, in my view,” Geoffrey Irving, a former OpenAI and Google DeepMind employee, said in a new interview. It’s one of a dozen interviews with AI researchers, including current and former employees at OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic. Palisade Research, which says it’s a nonprofit studying AIs’ capabilities and motivations, collected and launched the interviews on frominside.ai .
Several of the researchers joined Irving in warning about the possibility AI could drive humans extinct. Neel Nanda, a Google DeepMind research scientist, said there’s “at least a 10 percent chance that it causes human extinction, and that is ridiculously high.” We noted comments from both Nanda and Irving in a recent report about the “AI safety” community, and how difficult it is to nail down what that term means , or what anyone should do about it, and even these videos don’t have one cohesive solution to offer.
Former OpenAI researcher Daniel Kokotajlo went as far as claiming that superintelligent AI “would basically be god-like powerful,” and added, “unfortunately we don’t know how to control them at all. And so probably nobody would control them. This is exactly as dangerous as it sounds and must not be allowed to happen.”
While each video is available in full, the site also collects segments from multiple people speaking on similar topics, including whether this is all just hype or marketing, and why they would work on something that they believe is this dangerous. Some of the responses include Google’s Mary Phuong saying “I think you absolutely should be suspicious of what I’m saying because I am being paid by the lab,” and Nanda’s explanation that “If I did not believe that my work was directly reducing these existential risks, I would quit… These companies are not going to stop making these systems just because I quit.”
Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.
- Stevie Bonifield
-