How did the Chinese labs catch up so fast if most of the early training work was in the US?
Chinese AI labs like DeepSeek rapidly closed the gap with US counterparts such as OpenAI and Google, despite the latter's significant head start in training. This quick advancement is attributed to factors like open-source papers and computational resources. However, the origin of their extensive datasets remains a key question, with speculation including US data labs selling information and other undisclosed sources.
Why this oneThis discussion uniquely focuses on the data acquisition strategies of Chinese AI labs, unlike other analyses that primarily credit open-source papers and compute for their rapid progress.
Time & source
- Ingested
- 09/09, 00:00 UTC+0
- Source type
- Dev community
Discussion trend
The percentage is based on collected discussion signal, not new comments or independent people. The curve only compares the same topic across time.
Full text isn't available here.
Read at source →