If AI has the power to end civilization doesn’t it also have the power to save/protect it?

The discussion revolves around the dual nature of AI, questioning if its potential to cause global catastrophe, such as through bioweapons or supply chain disruption, also implies its capacity to protect civilization. The argument suggests that if a malicious entity uses AI for harm, competitive frontier models could be leveraged to counter such threats. This scenario is likened to a "spy vs spy" situation, where rapid identification and de-risking by other AI systems could mitigate or prevent damage.

This discussion uniquely frames AI's dual potential as a "spy vs spy" scenario, unlike typical debates that focus solely on existential risks.