Alibaba reportedly bans Claude Code internally over "backdoor" security concerns, recommending Qoder

I wanted to share this recent news from Chinese media regarding Anthropic's new tool, Claude Code:

Translation of the report: "On July 3, sources within Alibaba revealed that due to recent concerns regarding potential backdoor security risks in Claude Code, Alibaba has officially listed it as high-risk software. Starting July 10, employees are prohibited from using Claude Code in office environments, and are recommended to use Qoder as an alternative."

This raises a lot of questions about Claude Code's enterprise adoption and security. Because Claude Code operates as a terminal-based agent that interacts directly with our local files and executes commands, it makes sense that enterprise security teams might be highly sensitive to how it sends data back to Anthropic's API.

However, there is also the factor of geoblocking. Ever since Anthropic and OpenAI started restricting API access in certain regions, companies in those areas have been forced to push their own local alternatives (like Qoder).

As a regular developer who uses Claude, I want to see more open competition, but I'm also curious about the security aspect of Claude Code.

Does Anthropic provide enterprise compliance features for Claude Code that could prevent these kinds of bans? Have any of you faced security audits or restrictions when trying to use Claude Code at your company?