Back
RCreddit.com
16
·12 hr ago·Dev community · RSS

Anthropic cancelled the wrong org, kept ~$3,900 of what we paid, and support says the decision is "final"

View original
Claude

Heat trend

Collecting trend data

The percentage is based on available heat signal, not comment count or independent people.

EDIT — since half of you are stuck on the chargeback:

I waited multiple months before doing a chargeback. It took FOUR months to get a human from Anthropic to reply.

So to the "just go through proper channels" crowd: I did. For months. The channel is an AI agent that loops you back to itself. At some point a chargeback on a clearly-fraudulent duplicate charge isn't the nuclear option — it's the only button that does anything.

ORIGINAL

Posting our experience as a paying Claude business customer (30+ seats) in case it helps anyone weighing a Team/Enterprise plan. We run an annual Claude subscription for our company. Back in the spring we got accidentally double-billed — a duplicate org got created and charged alongside our real one (not a human error, bug on Anthropic's side).

- We did a chargeback on the duplicate. Fine, that got sorted.

- Reacting to that chargeback, Anthropic cancelled the wrong organization — our real, active one, not the duplicate. Killed a subscription we'd paid into all year, with ~315 of 365 days unused.

- We re-purchased the same day so our team wasn't locked out. Didn't want to make a thing of it. We like the product.

- Over the following weeks we'd added seats to that real org as we grew — each seat billed as its own invoice. Total paid into it: ~CA$9,900.

- Anthropic refunded us exactly the first invoice — the base subscription — and stopped there. Every seat we'd added on top, ~CA$4,900 worth, got cancelled too and was never refunded.

- So their "you've been made whole" math only works because they're counting the duplicate's refund twice — once against the duplicate (correct) and again against the real org (not correct). Two different orgs, two different charges. One refund can't settle both.

- I sent them a full breakdown. A spreadsheet with every invoice and live formulas. Offered to accept their number if they'd just run the proration on the seats instead of the base. Multiple times.

- Response: "the decision is final," "escalated internally," no case number after asking three times, and the duplicate org I asked them to cancel back in March is still not cancelled * four months later.

- What it comes down to: they billed us, cancelled the service through their own error, and kept part of the money. I'm not a lawyer, but I'd call that unjust enrichment — paid for something, didn't receive it, can't get it back.

- The frustrating part is this doesn't feel malicious — it feels like support and billing are so overwhelmed that a legitimate error just can't get fixed. Every reply took weeks. Half of them were from the AI agent.

- And the bind we're in: the clean remedy is another chargeback, but we're genuinely worried that disputing again gets our active account flagged or cancelled — and we actually depend on Claude day to day. So we're stuck choosing between the money and the risk.

- Genuinely love the product. That's why this is so disappointing. But if you're a business putting real money on a Claude plan, know that if billing goes wrong, there may be no one who can actually make it right.

Anthropic cancelled the wrong org, kept ~$3,900 of what we paid, and support says the decision is "final" · BuzzRadr