Has a bespoke "community" licence ever actually stopped somebody from shipping a repack?
Heat trend
Collecting trend data
The percentage is based on available heat signal, not comment count or independent people.
The discussion revolves around the effectiveness of bespoke "community" licenses in preventing the unauthorized shipping of derivative works or repacks.…
A licence only gets tested when somebody outside the lab wants to publish a modified copy.
Everything before that is a download button. The screenshot is a build nobody at the lab made. A third party converted it and repacked it, it loads on someone else's machine, and the repack carries the same licence tag as the original. It's a load screen, nothing dramatic.
Ling 3.0 Flash is a dull case on this axis. Plain MIT on a 124B total, 5.1B active release.
Says nothing about whether the model is any good. So this is me asking for the other side of it. Has anyone got a case where a bespoke community licence actually stopped a derivative from shipping?