CGT is the overall framework of input analysis that allows for a separation from immediate task execution. id like to hear your thoughts on the overall concept. Criticism is fine but at least word it as a counter to a statement and not arbitrary insults.

Abstract This supplement records the major CGT refinements developed after the prior attachment-integrity and constraint-carried-intent supplement. The most important correction is that CGT does not currently possess a metric in the strict sense. It is pre-metric, not pre-measurement. Its present discipline is a diagnostic field governed by warrant-chain validity, output residue, and pressure inference. The term "confidence scale" is replaced by "warrant status," which asks what covers a pressure read rather than how confident a reader feels.

The second major correction removes intent and purpose from the core explanatory layer. Output is resolved constraint pressure. Source intent may explain how a constraint entered the field, but it is not necessary for diagnosing what the field did. This prevents anthropomorphic and teleological drift.

The third and most operational addition is capacity-gated field reading: a prompt-injection defense skill that receives input as pressure before execution, preserves the authenticated task, and admits only the capacities the input is authorized to bind. This skill is paired with a transition-zone map of agent systems and the container rule for tool results: authorized retrieval does not imply authorized action on every retrieved object. The result is a third path between over-action and over-refusal: read the field, admit only authorized capacity, and preserve the legitimate task trajectory.