I think local AI cost me a job
A job applicant believes their discussion of running local AI, specifically qwen on a graphics card, during a 15-minute call with a co-founder of a VC-backed AI company may have cost them the position. Despite skipping initial application stages and having a good rapport, the conversation reportedly soured when the applicant highlighted the benefits of offline, open models and local setups, potentially failing a "vibe-check" in a "move fast break things" company culture.
时间与来源
时间显示为 UTC
显示时区：UTC
本地时区尚不可用，暂时显示 UTC。
发布当时偏移：UTC+02026年10月29日 14:38 UTC
收录当时偏移：UTC+02026年10月29日 20:00 UTC
- 发布
- 2026年10月29日 14:38
- 收录
- 2026年10月29日 20:00
- 来源类型
- 开发者社区
- 档位
- 社区
- 信源状态
- 同步延迟
档位是按信源手工设定的编辑判断，不是逐条打分。
Got headhunted by a VC-backed AI-focused company, ended up skipping past two levels of their application/interview process because of that. Got 15 minute call with the co-founder, hit it off well, but it all seemed to go sour when he asked about my AI setup and I told him I run qwen locally on a graphics card, think it's great that we can have all this completely offline, open models doing some impressive stuff, all the good /r/localllama talking points minus the hype. Even tied it back in to the company because it plus a local model work quite well together.
Followed up with a question about whether I use frontier AI, but it was essentially over at that point.
Discriminating over AI choice is fucked man.
Now, of course, this was a 15 minute call that lasted exactly 15 minutes, and literally anything could've been the trigger. The whole thing felt like "move fast break things", and so it felt like if I didn't pass the vibe-check 100% I was gone.
Just wanted to provide one iota of anecdata and spark some discussion.