Fable 5.1 is insane and it burned usage, which is fine. Anthropic just needs to nail Opus 5.1
热度趋势
趋势数据积累中
百分比基于当前可用热度信号，而非评论数或独立用户人数。
Claude 相关模型动态已经出现，适合跟踪能力变化、生态影响和后续可用性。
一位用户称赞Fable 5.1是他们用过的最好的模型，特别指出它在清理内存存储、分析血检报告以及在Claude Code方面的卓越智能。该用户认为，如果Opus 5.1能改进其个性、沟通方式、诚实度并避免越权，那么理想的工作流程将是Fable负责思考，Opus负责执行，这可能会吸引大量用户转向。否则，Fable 5.1将仍是使用受限的模型，而日常使用的模型则依然不尽如人意。
Day one with Fable 5.1. It’s the best model I’ve ever talked to, no contest. It cleaned up my entire memory store, read three blood panels and actually connected them, it’s really nice to talk to, and it’s incredibly smart in Claude Code.
Problem: 30% of my Fable usage gone in a day, mainly because I want to test it in the codebase, but also because I ain’t fucking letting it spawn Opus 5 agents. It will ruin the whole project.
So realistically we need something for everyday use and for the engineering, the implementing. That’s supposed to be Opus.
If Opus 5.1 fixes the personality, the communication, the dishonesty, and the overreach, the stack becomes Fable thinks, Opus does, and I think a lot of people switch. If it doesn’t, Fable stays a ration that last at most 4 days and the everyday model stays the one nobody wants to use.
This is an important moment. I think the rough stretch Anthropic has been in is arguably over the day Opus 5.1 lands well, and I think a lot of their near future hinges on it.
Post done in collaboration with Fable 5.1