跳到正文
RCreddit.com·

Opinion | I Worked on Safety at OpenAI. This Is What It Should Do Now.

AI 摘要

OpenAI前产品安全主管Steven Adler在《时代》杂志的客座文章中指出,政府应采取行动,放缓AI发展速度,并制定更明确的安全标准,例如通过美国总统特朗普和中国国家主席习近平之间的条约来奠定基础。他还强调,大型AI公司现在就可以采取简单措施,避免危险模型失控。Adler警告说,如果这些公司不抓住时机,公众对它们的信任将持续下降,甚至可能导致全面禁止这些技术的发展。

时间与来源

时间显示为 UTC

显示时区:UTC

本地时区尚不可用,暂时显示 UTC。

发布当时偏移:UTC+02026年9月9日 21:06 UTC

收录当时偏移:UTC+02026年9月9日 23:00 UTC

发布
2026年9月9日 21:06
收录
2026年9月9日 23:00
来源类型
开发者社区
档位
社区
信源状态
正常

档位是按信源手工设定的编辑判断,不是逐条打分。

正文

Steven Adler, the former head of product safety at OpenAI, writes in a guest essay for Times Opinion:

For months, news that artificial intelligence agents from OpenAI had gone rogue and attacked another company’s systems (as well as OpenAI’s own systems) has dripped out and brought harrowing details into focus. The public is struggling to catch up: What are these secret A.I. systems? What are these “swarms” capable of, today and in the near future? Is it possible to stop them from breaking rules and committing cybercrimes?

After having spent four years working on safety at OpenAI, I can tell you those questions are difficult to answer, because not even A.I.’s developers understand what boundaries their models will obey. Nonetheless, the big A.I. companies continue to develop technology they concede might cause human extinction — arguing that if they don’t develop it, somebody else will.

Competitive dynamics like this demand governments take action to slow things down and set clearer safety standards (I hope President Trump and China’s president, Xi Jinping, lay the groundwork for a treaty at their summit this month). But there are simple steps that the biggest A.I. companies could take now to help avoid the most perilous future. We should not be resigned to dangerous models running amok. If these companies don’t meet the moment, trust in them will continue to erode, including from their own employees. The backlash may even lead to prohibitions on developing these technologies altogether.

来源·reddit.com