Nvidia Proved that AI Model isn’t the Hero but the Harness is.
热度趋势
趋势数据积累中
百分比基于当前可用热度信号，而非评论数或独立用户人数。
Claude 相关模型动态已经出现，适合跟踪能力变化、生态影响和后续可用性。
英伟达的AI代理架构“Nvidia AVO”证明了“Harness”在AI性能中的关键作用。通过将其Harness作为Claude Opus 5的封装器，英伟达在ARC-AGI 3基准测试中取得了100%的成绩，这比之前的30%有了显著提升。此外，英伟达还证明了代理可以长时间运行，通过优化其GPU内核，使代理连续运行了7天。…
Techcrunch published this article which has gone viral.
The gist of the article is that Harness is as much as or in some cases more important than the model itself.
Nvidia has developed its own AI agents architecture called ‘Nvidia AVO’ and tackled two problems remarkably
One is where by using its Harness as a wrapper on Claude Opus 5, Nvidia achieved 100% on ARC-AGI 3 benchmark.
Previously, the above model could only achieve 30%
Secondly, it has proved that agents can be run for the longer durations(in days), Nvidia demonstrated this by optimising its GPU kernel by running agents for 7 continuous days.
What do you all think about this achievement?
Has anyone observed improved agent performance by just optimising Harness while keeping the model same?