Coding benchmarks are increasingly indirect benchmarks of how automatable every other white-collar job is.
AI在编程方面的日益精进,例如Claude和GPT等工具所展现的能力,预示着一个更广泛的趋势:AI自动化白领工作的潜力。作者作为这些AI工具的用户,认为AI在法律工作等任务中表现出的不足,可能源于自动化或脚本问题,而非AI的核心能力。随着这些程序性挑战的解决,编程任务的自动化可能会预示着对其他白领职业的类似影响,使得AI的进步成为所有人的担忧,而不仅仅是软件工程师的问题。
- 发布
- 2026年9月6日 00:07
- 来源类型
- 开发者社区
- 档位
- 社区
- 信源状态
- 同步延迟
时间以 UTC 显示
更多信息
I use both Claude (and Claude Code) and GPT (Codex) paying 400 dollars worth of subscription per month and maybe some extra tokens during busy times. I am not a programmer per se but I do a lot of computational work.
It strikes me that a lot of non-programmers (e.g. lawyers, scientists, consultants, analysts, accountants, or managers) might look at the rapid AI progress made in coding and think that this should only concern software engineers but not themselves.
But if you think about it, coding is the execution layer of a huge amount of white-collar automation. To automate a job, it is often not enough for AI to understand the work. It also needs to manipulate data, connect software, query databases, build pipelines, run analyses, generate documents, check outputs, and interact with existing systems.
And I think one of the reasons why earlier versions of the LLM were bad at this was due to bad scripts/coding and as such, this lack of ability propagated into low performance for these other jobs. But as AI becomes exceptionally good at coding, it can increasingly build the machinery needed to automate the rest of the work itself.
So what am I saying? I am saying that a lawyer who thinks that an earlier version of ChatGPT or Claude sucks might be pinpointing at the wrong sources of the error. It might not be that they suck because of their of ability that pertains to the law. It migt have been the case that getting the correct context, accessing the most updated data, etc. went awry due to automation/script issues. And as all of that gets taken care of and the growing amount of scripts to make all the procedural processes fast and accurate, the white collar workers might be saving the same predicament that programmers are facing right now. So basically, my main point is that AI getting good at programming isn't only software engineer's problem when it comes to future job prospects. It is everyone's problem.