Should useful corrections to AI count as paid work?
reddit.com 上的一场讨论探讨了对 AI 模型提供的详细纠正是否应被视为有偿工作。核心论点是，与简单的“踩”不同，详细的纠正代表了可能需要数年才能获得的宝贵知识。如果公司利用这些纠正来训练未来的 AI 模型，那么提供纠正的个人是否应该获得报酬，或者使用 AI 工具本身是否已足够作为回报，便成为了一个问题。这项询问是针对公众对 AI 训练数据看法的研究的一部分。
- 发布
- 2026年9月7日 05:44
- 来源类型
- 开发者社区
- 档位
- 社区
- 信源状态
- 正常
时间以 UTC 显示
更多信息
A thumbs down on a bad answer and a detailed correction from someone who knows the subject aren't the same contribution.
If a company uses that correction to train a future model, it's getting something that might have taken the person years to learn. Should that person get paid, or is using the tool enough in return?
Obviously paying for every message would invite a lot of junk. But treating all of it as ordinary feedback seems off too.
Where would you draw the line between using a product and doing useful work for the company behind it?
For context, I work on an AI project and am asking as part of research into people's views on training data.