The AI safety debate has a framing issue: nobody is actually arguing against safety

The AI safety debate is framed as a conflict between proponents and critics of safety, but this perspective is flawed. The core issue isn't a disagreement on the need for safety, as everyone desires it. Instead, the debate should focus on identifying who needs protection, what specific risks are being addressed, and the associated costs. This reframing could lead to a more productive discussion on AI safety.

This analysis argues that the AI safety debate is misframed, unlike common perceptions of a divide between safety proponents and critics.