My effective cost per million tokens: Sonnet 5 $0.26, Fable 5.1 $0.69, Opus 5 $0.72. Has anyone measured the same for OpenAI models?
A user shared their effective cost per million tokens for Anthropic models, noting Sonnet 5 at $0.26, Fable 5.1 at $0.69, and Opus 5 at $0.72. The close pricing of Fable and Opus, despite different list prices, is attributed to caching. Anthropic requires explicit opt-in for caching with TTLs and charges 1.25x or 2x input to write entries, while OpenAI caches automatically above 1024 tokens, charging 1.25x to write since GPT 5.6 without reporting writes. The user seeks comparable effective rates for OpenAI models.
为什么是这条This report uniquely details effective LLM costs, showing how caching makes Opus and Fable nearly identical in price despite different list prices, unlike OpenAI's caching approach.
时间与来源
时间显示为 UTC
显示时区:UTC
本地时区尚不可用,暂时显示 UTC。
收录当时偏移:UTC+02026年9月11日 07:00 UTC
- 收录
- 2026年9月11日 07:00
- 来源类型
- 开发者社区
讨论趋势
百分比基于采集到的讨论信号,不代表新增评论数或独立参与人数。曲线仅用于同一话题在不同时段的比较。
本站未收录正文。
前往源站阅读 →