跳到正文
RCreddit.com·

No, mathematicians or whatever professionals aren't resisting AI just because of 'human value'. They are protecting their economic leverage

AI 摘要

专业人士,包括数学家,抵制人工智能并非出于抽象的“人类价值”,而是为了保护他们的经济杠杆和生计。人工智能的整合威胁到他们在社会中的地位,促使他们争取在建立于人类集体工作基础上的技术中分得一杯羹。他们旨在确保自己在不断发展的模式中的地位,倡导“人类+人工智能”的结构,以避免他们的贡献被贬值的黯淡未来。

为什么是这条

该报告将专业人士抵制人工智能的根本原因归结为经济利益,而非此前普遍认为的抽象“人类价值”。

时间与来源

时间显示为 UTC

显示时区:UTC

本地时区尚不可用,暂时显示 UTC。

发布当时偏移:UTC+02026年9月11日 16:30 UTC

收录当时偏移:UTC+02026年9月12日 13:01 UTC

发布
2026年9月11日 16:30
收录
2026年9月12日 13:01
来源类型
开发者社区
档位
社区
信源状态
正常

档位是按信源手工设定的编辑判断,不是逐条打分。

讨论趋势

暂无对比
最近 24 小时与此前 24 小时的快照均值对比 · 7 天曲线

百分比基于采集到的讨论信号,不代表新增评论数或独立参与人数。曲线仅用于同一话题在不同时段的比较。

正文

People are resisting because this is literally their livelihood. What else are they supposed to do? Everyone will welcome AI with open hands if their place in society is already confirmed.

As it is right now, it's not. All the commoners are gonna be on the street at this rate. Utopia? Post scarcity? Meaningless concepts in a world with limited resources.

Just think about it, who will feed you after you lose your job? Democratic governments are only powerful because of the power the sheer collective holds. If labor is worthless, so is their elected representative.

Once the dust settles, there will be zero reason for those who control the production to use the resources to make things for the commoners. It doesn't require them to be evil masterminds either... it's as simple as: route resources to something that nets zero, or route it to some billionaire willing to pay good because their space factory needs that resource?

This is the time to act. We have to earn our place in the model. Demand a piece of the pie in the technology that's literally built on all of humanity's work, yours including, or try to keep together a version of the current structure (that is, human + AI, which is what professionals are currently fighting to keep). Otherwise, a bleak future is all that awaits.

来源·reddit.com