跳到正文
Rreddit·
Archived topic · 归档话题,来源已停止追踪

Sonnet 5 was supposed to be cheaper. It cost me more than Fable 5

AI 摘要

A user compared Claude Sonnet 5 and Fable 5 on two coding tasks. For a RAG Debugger, Sonnet was cheaper but slower, while Fable was faster and preferred. For a complex Clash Royale-style game, Sonnet took longer, cost more, generated more tokens, and required multiple fixes, despite being advertised as cheaper. The user noted that Sonnet 5's cost escalated quickly for longer coding tasks, suggesting that cheaper per token doesn't always mean cheaper per completed task.

时间与来源

时间显示为 UTC

显示时区:UTC

本地时区尚不可用,暂时显示 UTC。

收录当时偏移:UTC+02026年7月11日 15:00 UTC

收录
2026年7月11日 15:00
来源类型
未分类