The rhetoric is really heating up!
The rhetoric surrounding AI is intensifying, with the NY Times dedicating significant front-page coverage to the dangers and need for regulation of AI models. This has led to speculation that it signals the end of a bubble, with companies seeking regulatory capture. Some businesses are now actively looking to move away from frontier models, driven by data privacy concerns, especially after recent controversies like the math problem incident. The coming weeks are anticipated to be interesting, with potential new developments from teams like Qwen.
时间与来源
时间显示为 UTC
显示时区：UTC
本地时区尚不可用，暂时显示 UTC。
发布当时偏移：UTC+02026年9月13日 12:41 UTC
收录当时偏移：UTC+02026年9月13日 15:01 UTC
- 发布
- 2026年9月13日 12:41
- 收录
- 2026年9月13日 15:01
- 来源类型
- 开发者社区
- 档位
- 社区
- 信源状态
- 正常
档位是按信源手工设定的编辑判断，不是逐条打分。
The entire page of the NY Times today above the fold absent one article is AI (the models are just too strong/too dangerous, must be regulated). They forgot to include "Sponsored by OpenAI" at the end of the articles, sure that was just an oversight?
This is what the end of a bubble looks like, desperate attempts to get some sort of regulatory capture in place to keep the business model from collapsing in upon itself. My days next week are 100% booked talking to companies about how to get off frontier models, one large, and a bunch of smaller customers, including one who's flying me out to them to sit down and get a plan in place immediately (the controversy around that math problem really spooked some CEO/CIO's about data privacy using cloud models).
Gonna be an interesting few weeks. Maybe the Qwen team will be nice enough to give me a little breathing room before dropping another hydrogen bomb? :)