bonsai's document reveal how much cherry picked their headlines are
Bonsai's documents reveal discrepancies in their performance claims, particularly regarding the Ternary Bonsai 2 27B model. While Bonsai initially claimed 98.2% intelligence retained, their own evaluations show Ternary Bonsai 2 27B achieving 52.8 and 60.8 on Terminal-Bench 2.1 and SWE-bench Verified, respectively. This performance is compared to Qwen3.5-27B's 69.7 and 80.6, indicating that Ternary Bonsai 2 27B retains roughly three quarters of the full-precision performance on both benchmarks, rather than the higher figure initially suggested.
This report uses Bonsai's own documents to compare its Ternary Bonsai 2 27B model's actual performance against its advertised claims, unlike other reports that only cite the company's public statements.
时间与来源
时间显示为 UTC
显示时区:UTC
本地时区尚不可用,暂时显示 UTC。
收录当时偏移:UTC+02026年9月18日 14:00 UTC
- 收录
- 2026年9月18日 14:00
- 来源类型
- 开发者社区
讨论趋势
百分比基于采集到的讨论信号,不代表新增评论数或独立参与人数。曲线仅用于同一话题在不同时段的比较。
本站未收录正文。
前往源站阅读 →