Fable 5.1 outperforms Fable 5, Opus 5, and GPT‑5.6 Sol. Isn't time to reveal GPT-6 Astra?

查看原文

ClaudeOpenAI模型发布

热度趋势

趋势数据积累中

百分比基于当前可用热度信号，而非评论数或独立用户人数。

推荐理由

Claude 相关模型动态已经出现，适合跟踪能力变化、生态影响和后续可用性。

AI 摘要

Fable 5.1 的表现已超越 Fable 5、Opus 5 和 GPT-5.6 Sol，其成果被形容为“几乎令人印象深刻”。然而，Fable 5.1 的成本被认为高得令人无法接受，这被归因于 Anthropic 的固有弱点。鉴于此，有人提出疑问，现在是否是时候发布 GPT-6 Astra，尤其是如果它能以更低的成本实现类似的性能提升。

I tried Fable 5.1 and I can confirm it already surpasses Fable 5, Opus 5, and GPT‑5.6 Sol. While its results are ALMOST impressive, but he cost of Fable 5.1 is unacceptably too high(the DNA of Anthropic and its weak point).

Considering Astra’s evaluations by OpenAI HERE show dramatically better optimization and token efficiency than GPT‑5.6 Sol, the moment seems right to unveil GPT‑6 Astra with a more cost‑effective profile.

Isn’t it time to reveal GPT‑6 Astra, especially if it can deliver those gains at a real lower cost?