How does anyone use Astra?
一位Astra用户对他们的5x每月100美元套餐表示不满，称其每周限额在Astra高强度单线程使用2.5小时后便已耗尽。他们将此与Claude进行了不利比较，认为Astra在相同成本下仅提供Claude使用量的3-5%，因为Claude的“fable 5”可以连续多天、多线程使用数小时。该用户还指出，除了极低的用量限制外，“5.6 sol”和Astra之间没有发现任何显著差异。
为什么是这条该用户首次直接对比了Astra与Claude“fable 5”的使用限制和成本效益，揭示了两者在价值上的显著差异。
时间与来源
时间显示为 UTC
显示时区：UTC
本地时区尚不可用，暂时显示 UTC。
发布当时偏移：UTC+02026年9月9日 04:30 UTC
收录当时偏移：UTC+02026年9月9日 15:00 UTC
- 发布
- 2026年9月9日 04:30
- 收录
- 2026年9月9日 15:00
- 来源类型
- 开发者社区
- 档位
- 社区
- 信源状态
- 同步延迟
档位是按信源手工设定的编辑判断，不是逐条打分。
I’m on the 5x $100/month plan. My weekly limit was burned on one single thread Astra on high with 2.5 hours of usage.
Literally how are people using this? After I realized how quickly it burns through your limit I switched to medium, and in I think like 3.5 hours the weekly limit was also gone, one thread for routine accounting work.
If you proportionalize it to fable 5, for the same amount of money at Claude I’d say you get 3-5% of usage of Claude. As you can use fable for hours on end multiple days and multiple threads simultaneously without going through your limit. The limit resets with gpt feel like a super cheap gimmick when they’re meaningless as your limits run out in 2 hours of work.
I’m extremely disappointed tbh and all the hype is nonsense if you literally can’t use it.
Am I doing something wrong or this is just the age of people exaggerating everything. For what it’s worth on top of that I didn’t find any exceptional difference between 5.6 sol and astra on top of the horrendously low usage.