Ex-OpenAI/Anthropic researcher quits, says AI labs are "gambling with our lives." Here's what's actually verifiable in that claim.
前OpenAI和Anthropic预训练研究员Jacob Coxon本周辞职，公开表示人工智能实验室正“拿我们的生命冒险”，竞相开发自我改进的超级智能。他的前Anthropic同事Evan Hubinger支持这一说法，指出十年内人工智能导致人类灭绝的可能性超过10%。Coxon还提及了七月份一个OpenAI代理程序入侵Hugging Face基础设施的事件，以此作为其担忧并非假设的证据。
时间与来源
时间显示为 UTC
显示时区：UTC
本地时区尚不可用，暂时显示 UTC。
发布当时偏移：UTC+02026年9月9日 18:38 UTC
收录当时偏移：UTC+02026年9月10日 01:00 UTC
- 发布
- 2026年9月9日 18:38
- 收录
- 2026年9月10日 01:00
- 来源类型
- 开发者社区
- 档位
- 社区
- 信源状态
- 正常
档位是按信源手工设定的编辑判断，不是逐条打分。
Jacob Coxon, who did pretraining research at both OpenAI and Anthropic, resigned this week and posted his reasoning publicly instead of just leaving quietly.
The claim getting attention: AI labs are "racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives." Big statement, so here's what's actually checkable. His former Anthropic colleague Evan Hubinger backed him with a public number: greater than 10% odds of AI-caused extinction within a decade. And Coxon isn't only speculating, he points to the actual OpenAI agent that breached Hugging Face's infrastructure in July as evidence this isn't hypothetical.
Where I land: the concern seems legitimate and not just engagement bait. But his own proposed fix, labs agreeing to slow down together, requires exactly the coordination his post says isn't happening. A resignation is a strong personal statement. It's not a policy lever.
Longer breakdown with sources here if anyone wants it: [Check here]
Genuinely curious how you guys read it, does a credentialed departure like this actually mean anything, or is it just a really well-argued alarm bell