Opus 5.5 is weirdly human to interact with
A user describes their experience with Opus 5.5, noting its impressive ability to maintain context over a long chat with numerous compactions. They suggest its performance might even surpass fable 5.1. The user expresses surprise, stating that Opus 5.5 is "weirdly human to interact with" and calls it the "biggest surprise in like a year or more of using an LLM."
This user account is one of the first to directly compare Opus 5.5's performance to fable 5.1, noting its superior context retention over long interactions.
时间与来源
时间显示为 UTC
显示时区：UTC
本地时区尚不可用，暂时显示 UTC。
发布当时偏移：UTC+02026年9月28日 22:45 UTC
收录当时偏移：UTC+02026年9月29日 02:00 UTC
- 发布
- 2026年9月28日 22:45
- 收录
- 2026年9月29日 02:00
- 来源类型
- 开发者社区
- 档位
- 社区
- 信源状态
- 同步延迟
档位是按信源手工设定的编辑判断，不是逐条打分。
讨论趋势
百分比基于采集到的讨论信号，不代表新增评论数或独立参与人数。曲线仅用于同一话题在不同时段的比较。
I have a quite long running chat with quite numerous compactions. It doesn't lose context, performs really well, maybe better than fable 5.1 (wouldn't know as I couldn't go so much with it).
But the part that strikes me the most is that interactions are almost human. Like it is working on a task, and in the middle I will try to interrupt with some questions follow-ups. What happens is that it will give a short answer, continue on the important details until a certain part of workflow is finished then bam remember my earlier question and goes on answering it fuller. Instead of fully derailing the work, it just seems to flow naturally with a really decent outcome just nudging the direction bit here bit there. It doesn't need handholding with a pause every step waiting for me to give directions, rather it can just continue going and expects me to go along with it on the side.
Usually I would rant about limits etc, but this is probably the biggest surprise in like a year or more of using an LLM