[insert_AI_here] is AI and can (i.e. has full legal permission to) make mistakes
热度趋势
趋势数据积累中
百分比基于当前可用热度信号，而非评论数或独立用户人数。
reddit.com上的一篇讨论指出，关于人工智能可能犯错的法律免责声明，正在导致人们对人工智能质量的感知下降。作者认为，如果人工智能公司明确声明其产品预期犯错的百分比，例如“10%的时间”或“50%的时间”，那么当实际技术故障率超出这些声明时，企业用户将有法律依据对其提起诉讼。该帖子总结道，人工智能，就像自动驾驶仪一样，并非真正“被允许”犯错，然而，犯错越多，消除错误的经济动力就越小。
I think that this legal disclaimer is, in particular, contributing to the perceived decline in AI quality.
The kicker here, legally, is in the word 'can'. This should not be translated by the reader as "is likely to", or "has a chance of", but rather: " may ", or " is legally permitted to ".
If AI companies had written as their disclaimer: "AI is expected to make mistakes 10% of the time", or even 50% of the time, this sets up a risky situation in which corporate users being able to trace, definitively, 15% of technical failures out in the field (or 60% respectively) to the AI product used to design it, have a legal case against said AI company.
The word 'can' (i.e. 'may') effectively allows this percentage to be any number - or rather, a number dictated by the average hallucination rate in the industry as a whole. This creates a race to the bottom. Companies only need to compete with each other, and if their hallucination rates are all in the same ballpark, then there's more incentive to invest in feature creep as a one-up over competitors, as opposed to fixing the baseline. Thus, developers aren't tasked with reducing the hallucination rate to near zero.
AI is not permitted to make mistakes any more than a (real) autopilot is 'permitted' to make mistakes - and yet the more mistakes that are made, the less financial incentive there is to get rid of them.