Stupid Question
A user, familiar with common software and social media, expresses concern about AI doomsday scenarios. They question why AI cannot adhere to Isaac Asimov's Three Laws of Robotics, given that AI will eventually be integrated into robots. The user reminds readers of Asimov's laws: a robot must not harm humans or allow harm, must obey human orders unless they conflict with the first law, and must protect its own existence unless it conflicts with the first or second law.
This post uniquely highlights a common public concern by directly referencing Isaac Asimov's Three Laws of Robotics, unlike many discussions that focus solely on technical AI safety.
时间与来源
时间显示为 UTC
显示时区：UTC
本地时区尚不可用，暂时显示 UTC。
发布当时偏移：UTC+02026年9月19日 02:53 UTC
收录当时偏移：UTC+02026年9月19日 04:00 UTC
- 发布
- 2026年9月19日 02:53
- 收录
- 2026年9月19日 04:00
- 来源类型
- 开发者社区
- 档位
- 社区
- 信源状态
- 正常
档位是按信源手工设定的编辑判断，不是逐条打分。
讨论趋势
百分比基于采集到的讨论信号，不代表新增评论数或独立参与人数。曲线仅用于同一话题在不同时段的比较。
I only know about computers as far as regular programs, like Word, Outlook, Excel, social networking, and video games.
I’ve been seeing all these doomsday scenarios regarding AI and I am a little concerned. Not panicking mind you, but concerned.
My question is, why can’t AI follow Asimov’s “Rules for Robots” since basically that’s what AI is and will eventually implanted in robots.
As a reminder, here are the rules:
Isaac Asimov's Three Laws of Robotics (1940)
First Law: A robot may not injure a human or through inaction, allow a human to come to harm.
Second Law: A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings, unless such orders would conflict with the first law.
Third Law: A robot must protect its own existence, as long as such protection does not conflict with the first or second law.