I don't understand the constant bashing of GPT 6/6.1 Sol's performance relative to 5.6 and Astra. Why are we ignoring the elephant in the room, the absurd price + efficiency gains? It costs half as much as Sonnet 5.5, 1/3rd of 5.6 Sol, 1/5th of Opus 5.5, and 1.7th of Astra.
A discussion on reddit.com questions the criticism of GPT 6/6.1 Sol's performance compared to 5.6 and Astra, highlighting significant price and efficiency gains. The user points out that GPT 6/6.1 Sol costs half as much as Sonnet 5.5, one-third of 5.6 Sol, one-fifth of Opus 5.5, and 1.7 times less than Astra, suggesting these cost benefits are being overlooked.
时间与来源
时间显示为 UTC
显示时区：UTC
本地时区尚不可用，暂时显示 UTC。
发布当时偏移：UTC+02026年9月29日 20:54 UTC
收录当时偏移：UTC+02026年9月30日 05:00 UTC
- 发布
- 2026年9月29日 20:54
- 收录
- 2026年9月30日 05:00
- 来源类型
- 开发者社区
- 档位
- 社区
- 信源状态
- 正常
档位是按信源手工设定的编辑判断，不是逐条打分。
https://preview.redd.it/huqgxlvbuish1.png?width=1422&format=png&auto=webp&s=5ec18c8812535e0160863d4b27a818ae4fc47aee
Call me crazy, but even if its benchmaxed and worse than Sol 5.6, Opus 5.5 or Astra, I don't get why that would matter being THAT cheap with absurd intelligence per dollar.
https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/comparisons?compare=gpt-5-6-sol-medium%2Cgpt-6-astra-medium%2Cgpt-6-1-sol-medium%2Cclaude-opus-5-5-medium%2Cclaude-sonnet-5-5-medium