AI is basically ubiquitous in all corporate work but reddit is convinced AI is useless, how do those 2 things co-exists?
A Reddit user observes a perceived dichotomy between the widespread corporate adoption of AI in North America and the platform's general sentiment that AI is useless. The user notes that in many corporate jobs, AI is integral to daily tasks, with employees often having paid accounts and expected to produce AI-assisted output. This leads to confusion about how these two contrasting realities can coexist.
时间与来源
时间显示为 UTC
显示时区：UTC
本地时区尚不可用，暂时显示 UTC。
发布当时偏移：UTC+02026年9月29日 14:22 UTC
收录当时偏移：UTC+02026年9月29日 21:00 UTC
- 发布
- 2026年9月29日 14:22
- 收录
- 2026年9月29日 21:00
- 来源类型
- 开发者社区
- 档位
- 社区
- 信源状态
- 正常
档位是按信源手工设定的编辑判断，不是逐条打分。
I'm very curious how these 2 things can co-exists. How does this situation come about? If you are working at all in any corporate job (at least here in north america), AI is basically half of anyone's job. Everyone already has a paid account and most of your output is expected to be AI assisted.
However, most of reddit (take this thread for example) https://reddit.com/r/technology/comments/1wt6mcm/_/pcrh12q/?context=1 is hard convinced that AI is useless and is a complete waste of time/resources.
I'm really struggling to understand how can this happen? It's like there is a dual reality?