GLM 5.1 and 5.2 appear creatively lobotomized
热度趋势
趋势数据积累中
百分比基于当前可用热度信号，而非评论数或独立用户人数。
Claude 相关模型动态已经出现，适合跟踪能力变化、生态影响和后续可用性。
用户反映 GLM 5.1 和 5.2 的创造力和智能水平显著下降，认为其写作质量如同业余同人小说，并且更容易遗忘信息。这种对早期版本“阉割”的现象，尤其是在 GLM 5.3 发布之后，引发了用户猜测，认为这是为了促使用户转向更昂贵的 5.3 版本。许多用户表示无法负担 Claude Opus 等高端替代品，正在寻找更经济或免费的解决方案。
I have noticed a huge difference in quality, intelligence, creativity from the higher GLMs specifically 5.2. I actually noticed it with 5.2 first. Someone recommended going to 5.1 but it is also is creatively poor. Writing quality is like amateur fanfiction. It also loses itself way faster and forgets.
I know GLM 5.3 just came out but why do they have to lobotomize the earlier versions? Just to sell people to go to the more expensive 5.3? Why would I do that after they just did this? What are other people going to now that 5.2 and 5.1 are toast? Prefer cheaper or free obviously. I cannot afford stuff like the mid or upper tier Claude Opus and Fables.