AAAI 2027 Review: No code submission? [D]
热度趋势
趋势数据积累中
百分比基于当前可用热度信号,而非评论数或独立用户人数。
这条记录涉及编程工具或代码能力更新,适合开发者评估工作流变化和可复用价值。
I am now reviewing a bunch of papers for AAAI 2027 and it has surprised me the low amount of submissions with no code implementation. I don’t know if it has been only in my batch or it is common, but I was expecting very detailed appendices + code submission since AAAI is very explicit with the topic of reproducibility. I was planning to take this into consideration when assigning my initial scores, but I would like to hear your opinions. I have always submitted my code: it gives a very good impression and after reviewing process finishes we just publish it on ArXiv, so no one “tries to stole the idea” (although I think that this is very very unlikely). So I cannot find any excuse for those submissions that do not have code implementation, specially in today’s times where AI assistants can just write an empirical paper with artificial results within a couple of hours