Opus 5 is actually almost rage-inducing to use.
热度趋势
百分比基于当前可用热度信号，而非评论数或独立用户人数。
Claude 相关模型动态已经出现，适合跟踪能力变化、生态影响和后续可用性。
一位用户发现 Opus 5 几乎令人愤怒，尽管其底层能力很强。用户表示，即使尝试了 Anthropic 的建议和全局 claude.md 文件更改，Opus 5 仍然难以使用。Fable 模型没有这个问题，但其 200 美元套餐的每周使用限制不足。用户正在寻找替代方案，因为 Opus 5 的使用体验不佳，无法长期使用。
I've read the latest recommendations from Anthropic, I've tried all kinds of global claude.md file changes, but I just cannot make Opus 5 behave in a way that's pleasant to work with.
I'm not talking about if it's "nice" or "pleasant" in its phrasing, I'm talking about the following:
- Responses are way too verbose and buzzwordy and hard to follow. I legit don't read 90% of the output anymore, that's how bad it is. No matter what I put in my claude.md when it comes to communication style, after it did any type of meaningful work, it always reverts back to its extremely verbose, over-explained, buzzword heavy mess. Huge sentences & paragraphs which contain multiple concepts at once, using buzzwords constantly that serve almost no purpose except making it harder to parse, and just overall doesn't stop yapping.
- Simple tasks turn into these huge "projects" no matter how small something is.
- On the flip side, it just doesn't actually finish things properly. It made a change to a file, which invalidated something else in literally the same file. It then raises to me as part of its insanely wordy response that "I left x unchanged, but it is now no longer valid, let me know if you want it changed as well". It causes so much mental effort just to make sure it doesn't create rot in the codebase. The amount of times the response includes something to the extent of: "Worth knowing: my new change introduced issue x, let me know if you'd like that resolved" is just ridiculous. I feel like I need to prompt it 5 times just to actually finish the work properly.
Don't get me wrong, the model is still useful, it very clearly is still strong at the underlying tasks, but it is just a disaster to work with. Fable doesn't seem to have this issue, or at least to a much smaller extent, but even on the 200$ plan the fable weekly limits are not really enough to use it for most tasks.
Somehow, it has become a socially inept genius, that is both incredibly lazy AND way too overzealous at the same time.
Any tips to make this better are very welcomed, but really I just wanted to vent & provide some feedback because a model like this is just not something I can keep using long-term, I have to look into alternatives for the enjoyment of my work.